The attempt to persuade the court by most rhetorical and other means should also set a limit, and in this case the line has been crossed, and I will not add more!
Conclusion
- Ultimately, what is lifted from the aforesaid rule is that the claim is dismissed and the defendant's decision not to allow the plaintiff to open a bank account with him for the purpose of receiving the funds from the bank in Singapore will stand, since it was not found to be unreasonable in the circumstances of the case, and perhaps it would be concluded to say that it was required in the circumstances described.
- Taking into account the outcome and the manner in which the proceeding was conducted and the plaintiff's conduct vis-à-vis the defendant, even before the proceeding was conducted, while the concealment was greater than the disclosure and while naively refraining from transferring relevant information, the plaintiff will bear the defendant's expenses in respect of this proceeding in the sum of NIS 60,000.
The right to appeal to the Supreme Court within 60 days.
Given today, January 13, 2026, in the absence of the parties.