Caselaw

Labor Dispute (Tel Aviv) 44232-09-22 Woldemariam Mahari – Glossy Cleaning M.B. Clean Ltd. - part 51

February 23, 2026
Print

In relation to Gaitum - for the period from 4/2021 - 10.6.2022 (full-time), the plaintiff was entitled to 5 convalescence days in the first year and 1.16 convalescence days in the second year (= 6 convalescence days * 2.33/12 months), business restrictions - 6.16 convalescence days * 423 ILS per day = 2,607 ILS.  In practice, he was paid ILS 3,274 in the pay slips for the aforementioned period.  Therefore, defendant 2 (as opposed to the defendant) should not be charged with the differences for payment of convalescence pay.

Conclusion

  1. Therefore, we oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiffs within 30 days of the date of the judgment, the following amounts:

With regard to Mehri's claim:

  1. For overtime pay and weekly rest - ILS 8,170.
  2. For convalescence pay - ILS 6,317.
  • For holiday fees and holidays - ILS 6,880.
  1. For vacation redemption - ILS 8,938.6.
  2. Regarding the exchange of deposits to the study fund - ILS 14,435.77.
  3. For deposits for compensation and benefits - ILS 18,146.
  • Compensation according to Section 26A(b) of the Wage Protection Law - ILS 18,600.

The claim for the other components that were claimed is dismissed.

The defendant will pay the plaintiff expenses and attorney's fees in the sum of ILS 16,000 .

In relation to the Hillisage claim:

  1. For overtime pay and weekly rest - ILS 4,674.
  2. For convalescence pay - ILS 15.87.
  • For vacation redemption - ILS 1,013.24.
  1. For holiday fees - ILS 1,747.14.
  2. Regarding the exchange of deposits for compensation and benefits - ILS 11,687.2.

The claim for the other components that were claimed was dismissed.

The defendant will pay the plaintiff expenses and attorney's fees in the sum of ILS 3,800.

With regard to the Bottom Claim:

  1. For vacation redemption - ILS 526.64.
  2. In respect of holiday fees and in return for holidays - ILS 1,164.8.

The claim for the other components that were claimed was dismissed.

Since we have dismissed almost all of the claim, there is no room for an order for expenses in relation to this claim.

Previous part1...5051
5253Next part