And again, in the case we are dealing with, in contrast to the case of Haibtov, the confession to the informants came about 18 minutes later, when in our case it is a minor defendant who was brought into a cell at around 22:00 (after a busy and exhausting day of interrogation), in a cell with adult informants with large body dimensions with tattoos on the body, who portrayed the image of criminals who did not shy away from demonstrating a considerable degree of aggression and pressure that included, Among other things, the threat to use physical violence. Yes, we must not ignore the fact that the defendant did not meet his parents. Nor should we ignore the fact that shortly after the defendant entered the cell, he presented a position that did not constitute a confession. This was also the case immediately after the interrogation exercise. In other words, on the date prior to the defendant's entry into the dubbing chamber, he claimed his innocence, and so it was immediately after the second dubbing exercise came to an end. Needless to say, it is also necessary to reiterate that the defendant's confession included an incorrect and even false description of facts that do not lie under the truth.
The evidence to prove the first charge – the offense of arson:
- According to the facts of the indictment that I discussed above, Except for the offense of murder, Another offense involving arson was attributed to the defendant. According to what is attributed, we are concerned with the act of setting fire to a Silverado car belonging to Y's father'. For the sake of cleanliness, I will point out again, that the defendant confessed to the informants, As part of the second dub, In the commission of this offense, As reflected in the disc that is the subject of the conversation with the informants/20 and T/23a Concerning the transcription of that conversation. In the opinion of the accuser, In this case, The defendant's confession must be accepted and used as evidence to prove the defendant's guilt in committing the offense attributed to him.
- In this context, Evidence relating to the arson offense was submitted with consent:
A/174 T/175 of Y.VIII., The Complainant, Because his Silverado car was set on fire;