And later on:
"Truth is not the only value that the judicial process must realize. There are other values and interests that must be taken into account. The law is not based on the approach, because the truth will be revealed, even if the world is destroyed. The law takes into account additional values that can justify not revealing the truth. These values belong to the individual and to the collective."
- The accuser did indeed bring testimonies on behalf of people who knew the deceased and who testified about his good character. At the same time, it is evident that a certain mystery surrounded the deceased's occupations, which remained shrouded in mystery. Yes, we were not presented with any evidence regarding investigative actions that were taken (if any) for the purpose of denying the existence of conflicts/enemies to the deceased, in the course of his work (which we do not know, to this day, what it is). (See – in context, and mainly, the testimony of L., as I discussed above).
- It can be argued that the defendant's "dismissive" attitude toward the interrogators and his conduct, which constitutes defiance toward the law enforcement authorities, as the investigators say (which is not typical of the conduct of a normative person/minor) justified similar conduct on the part of the investigative authority, when its individuals used, more than once, unusual expressions, as detailed in previous chapters. It is also superfluous to refer to the conduct of the informants (who acted as the long hand of the law enforcement authorities), which included insults, the use of vulgar words, insults and even threats of violence, while urging the defendant (to abandon the right to remain silent) while placing him in a narrow and dark corner, knowing that we are dealing with a minor and that the dubbing process is not visually documented.
Again, I cannot understand why the law enforcement authorities were led to carry out investigative actions and interrogation exercises, in relation to a minor defendant, without any visual documentation, when there is no justification and/or reason justifying it. Go out and learn about the importance of the act of visual documentation from the amendment bill The Evidence Ordinance (No. 15) (Defendant's Confession of Serious Offenses), 5761-2000, H.H. 5761, No. 2928, p. 54 (October 30, 2000, 1 Cheshvan 5761), where the following was stated: