I deem it appropriate to note at this stage that I have found it appropriate to examine the entire investigative process (including the stages that preceded the second dubbing) on its knees and in its intimacy, in order to understand the implications that these stages have on the state of mind and spirit of the accused/minor, on the eve of his entry into the interrogation proceeding concerning the "second dubbing".
Even after I embrace the accuser's arguments, According to them, - The needs of the investigation justified the existence of the dubbing process at the time and time when it was actually carried out; Still, Even then, Unable to comprehend, What prevented the investigative authority from working for a visual documentation of the dubbing process (Done inside the police facility), Especially when it comes to a minor .
Let's not forget, Because, End of day, From the body of evidence brought before us, Rising, that the defendant was put in a detention cell (The dubbing chamber) Exhausted, After a very busy day of interrogation, Before he met any of his parents.
Lack of visual documentation
- Here it is., Similar to the first act of dubbing; Yes, Similar to the second interrogation (Edited by researcher Ben Lulu) And other investigative actions, This interrogation was also not visually documented. It should be emphasized, We are concerned with a fundamental flaw that runs like a thread along all the links of the chain of investigation that is the subject of this proceeding. About the Visual Documentation, See instructions below Section 7 Law Criminal Procedure (Interrogation of suspects), 2000"II - 2002:
"The following provisions will apply to documenting the interrogation of a suspect at the station::
(1) The interrogation of a suspect in one of the offenses listed in the addendum will be documented in visual documentation, Except in the circumstances as stated in the paragraph (2);
(2) The officer in charge may, Subject to the provisions of sections 8(2) or (3) or 11(A)(2), Order the documentation of the interrogation of a suspect in one of the offenses listed in the appendix to audio or written documentation instead of visual documentation, Whether due to a technical malfunction or due to a practical need, The suspect's interrogation cannot be documented in visual documentation; Such instruction shall be given in writing and shall include the reasons therefor; The circumstances that prevent the visual documentation from taking place have ceased to exist, The continuation of the investigation will be documented in visual footage;