Caselaw

Serious Crimes Case (Nazareth) 44182-03-16 State of Israel v. Anonymous - part 52

February 11, 2019
Print

                        The Defendant: They say I murdered something.

                        Machine from"2": What it means?

                        The Defendant: That's what they say.

                        Machine from"2": What it means? Oh?

                        The Defendant: What is it, what does it mean??

                        Machine from"2": What does it mean don't talk to me in depth...

                        The Defendant: They say that I murdered a person, I am suspected of murder...

Machine from"2": Listen, listen, you, Don't tell me they say you understand?     Lift your head up that I'm talking to you, you got it.?

                        The Defendant: Yes

            Machine from"2": What are you here for??

                        The Defendant: Forget it, brother, I don't.

The machine from "2": what is abandonment? Who asked you, I asked you to leave, what not to leave? What are you here for, baby? Oh?

                        The Defendant: Nothing, all sorts of things..

            Machine from"2": What are all kinds of things??"

(See - A/23Sun pp' 6, Lines 34-17).

  1. After he became aware of the defendant, Because the informants don't let go of him, He claimed, that he is suspected of committing a drug offense. This experiment did not hold water., So again we will ask, What is he arrested for? (A/23Sun pp' 7, Row 24) While the informants make it clear to him, Because we were talking about something else (Name, pp' 7, Row 30).  The defendant understood that his attempt was unsuccessful.  Then, He shared with the informants that he was also detained on suspicion of murder.  Up Next, Good news 37, This is how the informant turned to Seri, To the Defendant: "Come Here...  Now a good thing, good thing, what are you arrested for?"
  2. From this stage onwards, The informants began to ask the defendant questions incessantly, While demanding answers to the matter. It should be emphasized, They did not let go of the defendant, So whenever they didn't like the answer, They approached him again and again, Using demanding and sometimes even threatening language, So he was left with no choice but to answer.  For example,, They demanded to receive answers when an answer such as; "I don't know" Didn't suit them.  Take an Example: When the defendant stated that he did not know what happened and that he had only seen an article inynet, Here's how they reacted: "Tell me what you are coming to fuck my mind and all of Afula meter by meter, You're telling me I saw an article on Waynet?" (Name, pp' 8, Lines 28 -30) And later on.: "Who are you here to mix??" (Name, Row 32) And later on., "So what are you fucking my brain?, I saw an article on Ynet..  A cup of all Hawaiian Net Ohtok..  And not just Afula, you tell me in the neighborhood below your house, you play it for me, only on the Wi-Net, I knew.? Why did they put you in here?" (Name, Lines 34 -38).  For the sake of clarity, I will note, Because, One should not ignore the tone of speech of the informants when they approached the defendant and hurled at him the words detailed above.  It should be emphasized, This is a firm tone of speech, Tall bordering on shouting.

In response to the words of the informants, As explained above, The defendant answered, "How do I know I will show you what dubbed what maniac?" (Name, pp' 8, Row 39).  Up Next, Even after the defendant lifted his shirt and took out the pockets of his clothing items, In order to prove to his cellmates, Because it's not dubbed.  Even then, This was not enough to satisfy the informants who continued to demand answers from the defendant to the questions addressed to him.

Previous part1...5152
53...111Next part