The Third Investigation It took place on the same day that the defendant was arrested, when the interrogation was conducted on the way from the police station in Afula to the police station in Hadera. Even during this interrogation, the defendant maintained his right to remain silent. At the same time, when he was asked about his place of residence on the night of the murder, he replied that he did not leave the house during that night (P/76, p. 3, line 31). Further, the defendant was asked how he heard about the murder and replied: "I saw it on WeNet" (P/76, p. 10, lines 36-37), while at the same time he did not know how the deceased was murdered.
The Fourth Investigation; She was the one who was in the detention cell in Hadera when the defendant was placed in a room with two informants. As stated in this interrogation, the defendant confessed to the informants about his part in the murder, all as it emerges from the course of his conversation with the informants. (See reference above).
All four of the above interrogation actions were carried out on the first day of the defendant's arrest, i.e., on February 28, 2016.
The next day, i.e., on February 29, 2016, the defendant was brought before the interrogators again and interrogated for the first time The Fifth; During this interrogation, the defendant was taken out of the interrogation room for the purpose of interrogation in the station's yard. The Sixth Investigation. Even during these interrogation activities, while maintaining his right to remain silent, the defendant repeated his version that he was at home on the night of the murder and that his parents did not look for him that night (P/114, p. 31). It should be noted that in the course of those interrogation activities, the defendant did not tell about his experience in the detention cell beforehand.
The Seventh Investigation dated 02.03.16; Here, too, the defendant remained silent during the interrogation and refused to answer questions. Before signing the statement, the defendant asked the interrogators to correct him (with regard to the course of the interrogation, when he did remain silent and when he replied that he maintained the right to remain silent (P/89, pp. 24-25)). Admittedly, the defendant saw fit to volunteer details. However, he referred to a few details that are not essential to the investigation. (P/89, p. 17).