The defense argued that the coats contained no evidence that would link the defendant to the incident or the coats, and that its claims regarding the forensic findings on the coats were correct, since none of them had a genetic profile of the defendant found, and this possibility was even ruled out. However, the jackets were located near the lane where the Chevrolet was allegedly driving after its passengers, allegedly murdered the deceased, and Ituran's data indicated that the vehicle stopped at the scene (12 May 2022, p. 310, s. 7, and P/452).
Admittedly, the defense had many arguments in its summaries regarding the manner in which the coats were found, in relation to the identity of the origin, in relation to the manner in which they were located, and in relation to the initiative that led to that finding. We found no substance in these claims, and we categorically reject the claims of the "conspiracy" regarding the manner in which the police officers arrived at the location where the coats were found or that they were "implanted" in their hands. The testimonies of the aforementioned police officers were completely reliable to us, and contradictions of one kind or another that they fell into did not impair this determination. We state clearly and unequivocally that it has been proven before us that the coats were located where they were located, were not implanted or contaminated by any of the police personnel who treated them. We categorically reject the claim that some policeman brought them to the scene. The location of the genetic profile of the deceased (the left pocket in one of the coats) greatly reduces and perhaps even zeroes the risk of infection and the transfer of the profile from police officers who visited the scene of the murder to the coat. Therefore, with regard to the claim of "contamination" and the secondary transmission of a genetic profile, we reject it categorically as a distant and theoretical claim that does not receive any confirmation in view of the evidence that has come before us. Moreover, indeed, even if we accept the defense's argument that the deceased's genetic profile reached the coats due to "contamination" and the lack of proper protection of the scene, while placing the coats on the ground on which police officers who were also present at the scene of the murder stepped on, this does not prejudice the clear finding that arises from the "sight of the coats"; After all, even without a profile of the deceased, they resemble the coats worn by the two, who were seen getting out of the Chevrolet before the murder and arriving after the murder; What is stated in the coats that fit the theory of Ruthie Arnon, the widow of the deceased (regarding the clothing of the murderers) who was with him at the time of his murder, and their number (2) corresponds to the number of people who are alleged to have worn them.