100% of the shares of Company C Ltd.
50% of the shares of D. Ltd.
33% of the shares of V. Ltd.
- Company B Ltd.
At the time of the opening of the proceedings: 76% of the shares were owned by "AA Ltd."
When the additional shareholder, who holds 24% of the shares, is Mr. B.
Since the establishment of XX Ltd the holding of the registered shares has remained intact, but in fact the
XX Ltd is the holder of the shares of AA Ltd.
- Company C Ltd.
All of its shares are held by Company B Ltd.
- Company D Ltd.
At the time of the opening of the proceedings: 100% of the shares were owned by AA Ltd.
Since the establishment of XX Ltd the holding of the registered shares has remained intact, but in fact the
XX Ltd is the holder of the shares of AA Ltd.
- It owns plots designated for construction worth approximately NIS 6,000,000, and it is possible that it is engaged in a construction project on these lots. The temporary foreclosure order was also imposed on half of the respondent's rights in these lots.
- Company V Ltd.
At the time of the opening of the proceedings: 50% of the shares were owned by AA Ltd., while another 50% of the shares were owned by another company, whose shareholders are not family members.
Since the establishment of XX Ltd the holding of the registered shares has remained intact, but in fact the
XX Ltd is the holder of the shares of AA Ltd.
- It owns land in Complex F (3,247 out of 96,207 plots) with a value of NIS 1,008,143 .
- Company H in a Tax Appeal
At the time of the opening of the proceedings: 50% of the shares were owned by AA Ltd.
An additional 50% of the shares are owned by a different company, whose shareholders are not family members.
Since the establishment of XX Ltd the holding of the registered shares has remained intact, but in fact the
XX Ltd is the holder of the shares of AA Ltd.
- It owns contractual rights in a residential unit on the third floor and two stores worth NIS 10,000,000. The company is engaged in a construction project that includes buildings in this complex.
- Company T Ltd.
At the time of the opening of the proceedings: 50% of the shares were directly owned by the man, while another 50% of the shares were owned by another person, who is not a family member.