I am of the opinion that the concentration of the plaintiff's conduct as detailed above shows that she should be given some responsibility for her damages, which I estimate at a rate of 50%. (See similarity Civil Case (Economic) 1664-12-15 Bracha Klein v. Menkes Online Trading in a Tax Appeal [Nevo] (April 17, 2018) - where the plaintiff was charged a contributory fault rate of 40%, however, in my opinion, the circumstances in this case are more serious from the plaintiff's point of view).
Conclusion;
- The claim against defendants 1 and 2 (Global and Shabbat) is partially accepted, with the plaintiff's contributory fault rate at 50%. In light of this, defendants 1 and 2 will jointly and severally bear the plaintiff's damages at the rate of 50% of the amount of the claim ILS 3,659,100 (see paragraph 52 above of the judgment) i.e., in the sum of ILS 1,829,550 - together with linkage differences and interest as required by law from the date of filing the claim until the date of the actual full payment.
- In addition, defendants 1 and 2 will bear jointly and severally the plaintiff's attorney's fees at the rate of 25% of the amount of the judgment and will also bear, jointly and severally, the payment of the court fee at the rate of 50% of the amount actually paid by the plaintiff, together with linkage differences and interest in accordance with law from the date of filing the claim until the date of actual payment.
- The claim against defendant 3 is dismissed. I did not find that the plaintiff should be held liable for the expenses of defendant 3 since the defendants provided joint representation.
- The Secretariat will communicate the judgment to the parties.
Given today, June 23, 2025, in the absence of the parties.
Limor Bibi