The Circumstances of Attendance
This is circumstantial evidence. There is no dispute that the defendant was present in the apartment and in the yard at the time of the violent incident in which the deceased's death was caused. There is no evidence of the presence of any other person, neither in the testimonies, nor in the cameras nor in the forensic evidence, but in the breath of the accused. When the defendant's testimony was heard and found to be manifestly unreliable, his testimony was rejected. When the defendant's testimony was rejected, his claim that there were other people there was rejected (inter alia, because he did not say anything about it when he went out into the street and saw people). If the defendant was with the deceased, when no one else was with the deceased, it means that the defendant was alone with the deceased at the time the deceased was stabbed by someone. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this circumstance is that the defendant is the murderer.
The defendant's words to the first policeman
This is evidence of the kind of what a defendant said. In the early stages of the incident, when the patrol officers were still trying to decipher what exactly happened, and at a stage when the defendant was still perceived by the police as a victim of an offense, and not as a suspect, Policeman Elad asked (see P/27A): "Are you conscious? Can you talk for a moment? What exactly happened?" The defendant replies, "He stabbed me," to the question of who exactly responds to the defendant "Ben" and "Ben Dadon." In other words, the defendant confirmed that there was a violent incident between him and the deceased. The policeman, who never imagined that the seriously injured (the deceased) was "Ben Dadon," whom the defendant claims to have been injured, innocently asks, "And the other one was injured by whom?" The defendant replies, "I don't know." To the question of why he was attacked, the defendant replies, "I don't know, he attacked me," and to the question of why the other was attacked, he replies, "I don't know." The policeman then asks about another person who lives there, and the defendant says "Dan Dan" and "Daniel Sarahsher." Following an explicit question, "What is the name of the guy who did this to you ?" (Assuming that the defendant and the deceased were both attacked by the same person), the defendant replies, "Daniel Sarahsher." After the policeman realizes that there is some confusion, he asks again and is answered, "Ben Dadon." The policeman asks, "Are you sure? Alone?" and the defendant answers in the affirmative.