The witness added that he did not remember when he learned that the rights in the property had been transferred to the defendant's name.
Mr. L.S., the defendant's son also testified, and according to him:
"... That after a certain period of time, I don't remember, exactly, how many, how many weeks, I think, my grandfather called me, he said to me, thank you, you gave me the phone, and we completed the deal. I called N., and I spoke to N., and I informed him that I had transferred the apartment to your mother, as a gift... He told me that N. was very angry with him, he yelled at him, he swore at him, it was a very unpleasant conversation, and not difficult, and, and difficult, and that's it. After a while, after a certain period of time, I don't remember telling you, how much, if it was, a few days, or, I don't remember, N. called me, and he said, why did you move the apartment, in your mother's name? I said to him, N., my friend, he's my uncle, yes? I told him, N., listen, I'm not involved in this. I didn't move the apartment. Anything you have, please contact my grandfather. You know him, you have his phone, talk to him, please, don't involve me, in this... No, but it was, after my grandfather called me, he told me, he told me, I moved the apartment, in your mother's name. I called N., N. answered me, and he told me, and he was very angry with him, and was in a very unpleasant conversation. That's how my grandfather told me, I wasn't involved in the conversation."
The aforesaid is sufficient to determine that even if there was no knowledge of the actual transfer of the rights in the property to the defendant, there was knowledge that the deceased intended to transfer them to the defendant, and to deprive the plaintiff of part of them , at least during the six months prior to his death.
On the face of it, in addition, there is a question regarding the date on which the plaintiff decided to file the suit, i.e., after the death of the deceased, and not before, and it is clear that if she had filed the claim in real time, it could have been clarified more easily on the basis of her familiarity with the mutual will, with the assistance of the father's testimony, which could have shed light on the disputes.