From all of the above, the claim of the minor in all its parts must be rejected.
P/172 is a photocopy of a police interrogation in which the defendant was interrogated, and is admissible evidence.
The defendant's statements in the framework of P/172 are made by him freely, without any improper procedure imposed on him. Moreover, the defendant was seen to be the one who was constantly leading the discourse.
The defendant is even trying, on his own initiative, at his request, and completely freely, to initiate renewed negotiations regarding the return of the weapons in exchange for a reduction in the sentence, this is not carried out, and in practice no such negotiations take place.
It clearly appears that the defendant himself sees the stage filmed in P/172 as part of a previous interrogation, which took place a few minutes earlier.
As noted, at certain stages the discourse relates to negotiations, but this is at the initiative of the defendant, and here, too, not in relation to his being a state witness.
From all of the above, the defendant's many statements in the framework of P/172 are admissible and constitute one of the main evidentiary bases for his conviction.
The defendant's statements in his interrogation P/172, in addition to the explicit confessions therein, also include the defendant's knowledge of material details, and constitute a solid basis for the conclusion that he committed the charges against him.
In his interrogations, and especially in the framework of P/172, the defendant speaks and shares a great deal of information with his interrogators, including the relative role of each "accomplice" in the affair, as well as details about the quantities of weapons that were stolen, repeatedly says that he "got into a situation" and places himself at the heart of the affair and as one of the factors in it, and even notes that he estimates his own share at 20 percent. Shadi's share is 50 percent and his son Adi's is 30 percent, and the defendant clearly answers yes to questions about the weapons.