Even if it could be said that there is a connection, and I do not find any truth in this argument, the connection is not for negotiations for a state-witness agreement.
More than necessary, I will refer below, on the question of admissibility, to the interrogation that is filmed in the framework of P/172, and it will already be said that it only strengthens the above conclusions, it is not a continuation of the dialogue with the intelligence personnel, it is part of another and separate stage in which it is clear to the defendant that he is separate, in the framework of which there is no negotiation that the defendant is a state witness, and above all, The defendant is the initiator and is the one who constantly leads attempts at negotiations, when in practice such negotiations do not take place in practice.
Interrogation of the defendant by the police on 2 August 2016, in the second part - P/172
- On the course of the controversial investigation between the parties (The investigation from 2.8.2016 In the second part- A/172) Testify.A. 13, Researcher Eyal Zeitoun, And she testified.A.24, Asher was in charge of the entire investigation, And at some point she entered the interrogation room during this interrogation.
To complete the picture, it should be added that with the exception of P/172, all of the defendant's statements were submitted to the police with consent, and there is no dispute about their admissibility. I will not elaborate on them, and they do not include confessions, but mainly sweeping denials on his part, statements that he does not remember, and statements about Shadi that he is a liar.
In all the interrogations he is warned, and his right to consult with an attorney is explained, it appears that he is represented and has received advice, and it even happened that the interrogation was stopped at his request so that he could speak with his attorney.
It should also be noted that in some of the interrogations he was asked about the two dates of April 16, 2016, for example, P/159, questions 149, 193, and questions 228, 240, 294, etc.