It should be noted that in her questions to 30. A.13 In his interrogation in court, the accuser's counsel refers to P/161, and the witness responds with reference to P/161. However, P/163 is what was presented to the witness, and it is the document that is the testimony that was taken on August 2, 2016, before P/172. There is no dispute that P/163 is the first notice dated August 2, 2016.
In his testimony in court, investigator A.A.13:
"Q. per day 2.8.16 Tell us what happened from an investigative point of view of what happened?
- In addition to this case, the defendant had another case of Alem"2 who should have been interrogated on that day. ... Towards the end of the investigation, R.Retrial Mazal Asrihan's questioning noted that the investigation into Alam"In Do Separately. I have completed the current investigation, And I went out to change the disc" (Peru' From the day 18.4.17 pp' 61 Shaw' 18-22).
"Q. What happens when you go back to explore what's going on between you?
- When I enter the room back, The recording works as a new recording, which was supposed to be the recording of the interrogation in the Elm file"But she continued to act within the framework of what happened, and I am now beginning to describe. When I entered, the defendant turned to me, And shows me on the testimony some problems that bother him, as I mentioned, one of them is a photo identification arrangement of his that I was supposed to do to another suspect named Shadi Bashir".(Peru' From the day 18.4.17 pp' 62 Shaw' 24-29).
"Q. Tell me what bothered the defendant, You said he was bothered by a few questions, A number of points in your inquiry/161, in the typed part that you gave him before you went out to replace the disc, And what bothered him, One point is that it's a matter of an identification lineup, you will elaborate on it?
- I asked the defendant if I would show your picture to the"The other suspect named Shadi Bashir, Will he recognize you?? In the testimony typed T/161 He told me not. When I returned to the interrogation room after replacing the disc, Focus on this question, And he told me I don't remember the exact words, There's it in the transcript, Not sure, Will or will not recognize, It is possible that he will recognize, I realized he had a problem with this answer, ז"That Shadi Bashir does know the defendant, Not as the defendant claimed in the interrogation that he would not recognize him because he did not know him.
....
- I present you with the message/161, Look where the correction you made in which line you made a handwritten correction?
- Ltd.' 2 Shaw' 23 Latt/161 The defendant asked me to correct the wording "When you are a shovel" Missing letters R' and- J', So the word should be "When you saw" and add a word immediately afterwards in sequence "and download".
- On what issue was this talking about the correction??
- I asked the defendant the same question, In the same interrogation that immediately after the interrogation we will go to the Beit Kama compound, And that the defendant will show us where he saw and took his son down, Beit Kama, Where did he drop him off? Somewhere in the Beit Kama compound, he dropped him off.. This is the request that the defendant asked me to amend and add. So I corrected it by hand at his request".
(Pro. of April 18, 2017, p. 63, questions 3-11, questions 18-26).