"Q. I'm going back to your or the suspect's conversation with Oh"d. The defense claims that in that conversation the proposed punishment of 5 Years?
- It could be.
- Explain to me how it was done?
- This conversation was not recorded because it was a conversation"IV, And about brother software"I spoke to the defendant in the room, From what I remember, I asked him"D. to come to the district attorney in order to manage some kind of"Because it was important for us to bring back Hamel"8 to the State, For reasons that are obvious, I also spoke with the District Attorney to try to bring about an appropriate and acceptable punishment for him, And the surrender of Amal"that the public interest is clear. In a big way as far as I can remember, I said that a year is not on the agenda, And we can talk about 5 or 7 Years of punishment that seemed reasonable with Hamel's extradition"VIII, Eao's Answer"The defendant's D was unequivocally not, There's nothing to talk about. That's where the conversation ended. I went back to the defendant, I think, and I informed him that if he wanted to talk to him"IV.
- You said that at the beginning of the interrogation there was 46"What was Momo's theme"From what did you understand what kind of deal is on the agenda?
- From what I understood, the defendant was willing to turn in Hamel"8 to the State, And in return for that, as far as he was concerned, he was sentenced to a year in prison. ..
- The defense's argument in the framework of the minor arguments, Shame"M was Mo"From being a state witness, Did such an issue arise?, What do you have to say about this matter?.?
- Anonymous, There was no talk of a state witness. Throughout the conversation, the defendant even led and claimed all the time that he was supposed to sit for only a year, Because this is what he was promised and in return he will give his hope"VIII, A state witness is something else".
(Pro. of April 23, 2017, p. 192, questions 1-21).
This attitude of A. A.24 should have been both that Asher understood that he had been in the framework of the intelligence investigations in which she did not participate, and in relation to the defendant's requests in the framework of P/172 to negotiate again, in this matter, of the return of the weapons.