It should also be noted that the defendant waived Shadi's testimony after Shadi was brought to the hearing. The defendant waived Shadi's cross-examination, in which he could have asked Shadi many questions, and he refrained from doing so. Thus, he could have asked Shadi about his acquaintance with the defendant, and many other questions. Since the defendant refrains from doing so, and his reasons are reserved with him, no weight should be given to the arguments in respect of which he could, insofar as they are substantial, have received confirmation on the question addressed to the witness.
The explosion in the warehouse, which contained some of the weapons, and the alleged connection to theT.43
- Testimony 70.A. 43 and locating Amal"H in the warehouse - Following a report of an explosion in a warehouse, a sapper arrived and identified several remnants of shrapnel grenades, Laor missiles and Matador missiles, And some of the identification numbers confirm that this is part of Amel"8 That was stolen (ר' Hu"D. The Saboteur/133-A/134).
According to an inquiry made, the warehouse belongs to L.A. 43, who testified that this is an area that has not been used for a number of years (p. 23.3.2017, p. 45, question 13), and he testified that he knew the defendant and that they worked together in the council elections (p. 46, questions 13-15), and regarding the warehouse, he testified that it was an unfenced and breached area that anyone could enter (p. 51, questions 13-23).
A.A. 43 He was interrogated at the time of the explosion regarding his involvement in the affair, but it can be understood that this investigation ended without findings.
Counsel for the accuser refers to the defendant's phone locations and the fact that he spoke with A.A. 43 on April 30, 2016, and claimed that the dialogue between the two parties, whose relationship ended about a year ago with the end of the council elections, was puzzling, and that the defendant himself was unable to explain the puzzling engagement betweenthem.