Caselaw

Serious Crimes Case (Beersheba) 20142-08-19 State of Israel v. Ibrahim Shehain - part 142

October 23, 2025
Print

It should also be said that it is impossible to rule out the possibility that the severe roughness in the testimonies of defendants 2 and 3 stems from the fact that they are afraid to reveal another truth, which is not related to the degree of their responsibility for the murder in question.

Therefore, although in my opinion the testimonies of defendants 2 and 3 were far from convincing, I accept my colleague's conclusion that it is impossible to "completely negate" the main points of their version, and in any case acquittals are required due to doubt, and their conviction is required according to the psychological basis that they claimed only.

 

Alon Infeld, Judge

 

Honorable S.  The President, Justice A. Vago:

I agree and attach my opinion to the orderly and deeply convincing judgment of my colleague Justice A.  Strong, and to the proposed result, and even to the tender comments of my colleague Justice A.  Infeld.

 

Ariel Vago, Vice President

Presiding Judge

 

Therefore, it was decided to decide the defendants' sentences, as stated in the opinion of the Honorable Judge Ariel Hazak. 

Granted today, October 23, 2025, in the presence of the parties. 

 

         
Ariel Vago, Vice President

Presiding Judge

  Alon Infeld, Judge   Ariel Hazak, Judge

 

 

Previous part1...141142