"The constitution under discussion here is an economic constitution, for the sake of an economic arrangement, and by its nature it must also apply to the main issues of economics, to corporations. Another example: It is inconceivable that the criminal provisions in the Defense (Finance) Regulations will not necessarily apply to banks, because they are limited liability companies."
He goes on to emphasize on page 139 of the judgment, what I brought at the beginning of the decision, that:
"In the offenses before us, not only will it seem strange and undesirable, but we will also consider the intention of the legislature if we allow incorporated bodies because they are incorporated to say: 'The individual member who was involved in the act will be prosecuted and we have fled.' We have shown above that the National Law does not contain any provision that requires such an interpretation. And the opposite is true."
And the fight of these things is not a miracle, perhaps, unfortunately, the opposite is true.
About a decade later, the Supreme Court addressed this question in the context of the traffic offense of a partnership vehicle: Criminal Appeal 232/62 Shaffer, Tusia Cohen & Co. Registered Partnership v. Attorney General, IsrSC 17 1905 (1963). In that case, Dor was in the offense of strict liability. Adv. Shafer argued in the same matter that he recognizes that by virtue of the doctrine of organs, it is possible to impose criminal liability on a corporation, but driving a vehicle is not one of the duties of a law firm, and therefore, they argued, it cannot be held criminally liable for traffic offenses. The Honorable Justice M. Landau rejected this argument, noting that "the question of the criminal responsibility of the legal personality in criminal cases is still in the process of being clarified" (ibid., at p. 1910). However, the Honorable Justice M. Landau went on to point out the basic and fundamental principle, which there may sometimes be a tendency to forget, that alongside the benefits deriving from the corporation, there are also duties and liability, and in his words (at p. 1911):