Caselaw

Criminal Case (Jerusalem) 54589-02-17 State of Israel v. Oshri Sharon - part 14

May 31, 2026
Print

As mentioned above, Shahar was a salesman and customer manager at Wee, who was in charge of customers in the defense industries with whom Wei entered into transactions for the sale of computing solutions.  He signed e-mails he sent, inter alia, to customers, stating his position as Senior Account Manager (e.g., P/289), referring to, as he testified, a salesperson and a customer manager (p.  2677, paras.  3-13; p.  3302, paras.  13-20).  In his position, Shahar was responsible, inter alia, for Wii's main clients, including IAI, Elbit and Alop (p.  4304, paras.  5-7).  These are significant customers of Wee.  Oshri testified that IAI, which was a customer of Shahar and under the responsibility of Shahar, was a significant customer of Wei in terms of the scope of its activity with it, and that the work with it was also complex in view of the large number of factories and the multitude of entities with which Wei was required to work (p.  4301, paras.  13-20).  Oshri testified that Shahar worked with many factories and many projects, and from a practical point of view, he had dozens of clients (p.  4304, pp.  5-14; and see also Shahar's resume in which he wrote that he was a "security sector manager" in Way, N/279).

Shachar was directly subordinate to Oshri.  He worked directly with Oshri, in practice, throughout the entire period (p.  2615, p.  13; p.  2616, paras.  1-9, where he testified that Oshri was his direct manager; see also Oshri's testimony, p.  4302, paras.  6-8).  Shahar's testimony revealed that he and Oshri worked closely and cooperatively.  Shahar testified that he and Oshri worked as a team, with Oshri in charge of the technical aspect and Shahar in charge of the sales side, and Shahar was the one who would issue the quotes to the customers - including IAI.  This is similar to the way Oshri and Shahar worked together in Triple C in the past, as a team (p.  2616, s.  2-16, p.  2617, s.  2-6).  Shahar had a certain discretion when it came to price quotes.  Shahar was authorized to handle bids on his own when it came to a small amount of money.  Oshri was involved in some cases, for example when more complex calculations and the construction of Excel tables were required, in which Oshri had an advantage and knowledge (p.  2617, paras.  7-9; p.  2774, paras.  5-12; p.  2772, s.  15 - p.  2773, s.  3, where Shahar testified about cases in which, in accordance with his authority, he submitted price quotes independently and without Oshri's involvement, for example, when a small-scale transaction was discussed; p.  2778, S.  8-15).  Shachar further testified that the content of the position as a customer manager or salesperson and his powers also depend on the character of the person acting (p.  3582, paras.  13-19) and that he himself acted, in Oshri's opinion, independently and according to his discretion and what he saw fit (p.  3355, paras.  13-16).

Previous part1...1314
15...286Next part