First, the correspondence explicitly stated that these were prices for the customer, Elta, and not for the sale prices of Wei Harel or Triple C (for example, in the margin of P/289 "Total Price for Elta"; and P/291, which is Harel's proposal, which is addressed at the head to Elta). To the e-mail message, a copy of which was sent to Oshri, Shahar attached an Excel table with prices (P/289), which was edited exactly in the format in which Mordechai requested to receive the prices to Elta itself (see P/288, a copy of which was also forwarded to Oshri), in a manner that is inconsistent with Oshri's claim that he believed that this was an offer by Shachar for the purchase between Harel and Levy, that is, a price quote from Wee to Harel regarding the prices at which Harel could purchase equipment from Vi in connection with Balam Indra (p. 4858, s. 5 - p. 4860, s. 25, even ignoring the fact that Oshri initially claimed that the notice was not sent to him at all, p. 4857, s. 20 - p. 4858, s. 2; and contrary to what has become clear, P/564, p. 4873, paras. 4-23). In addition, even if we assume, as Wee claims, that Harel or Triple C could not have purchased equipment from Mantap and were required to purchase it from Wee, the price quotes that were conveyed to Oshri relate to the entire contents of the equipment at Balam Indra, including IBM equipment and products that no reason was given for Harel or Triple C to purchase from Wee in the circumstances of the case. Nor was the basis laid for the fact that there was or that there was any agreement between Wee and Harel or between Wei and Triple C that any of them would purchase equipment from Wei in connection with Balam Indra, and in any case Oshri could have thought, even if mistakenly, that this was the explanation for the correspondence for which a party was a party and the price quotes that were conveyed in their framework.
Second, as we saw above, Gilad and Naveh forwarded to Shahar in real time the price quotes they had actually submitted to ELTA. This is close to their submission and in a manner that indicates that these are the proposals submitted by Harel and Triple C to Elta itself. Shachar conveyed the matter to Oshri - as they are - in a manner that clearly indicates that the offers were also received from Gilad and Meneva themselves and not from any other source (P/291 - Forwarding Gilad's email to which the price quote to Elta was attached on a sheet of paper with Harel's logo; P/15 - Forwarding the Triple C offer to Elta, to Shahar and from there to Oshri, all on top of the email in which the offer was submitted to Elta). Even if it were possible to accept a close argument raised by Oshri according to which he thought that the price quotes of Harel and Triple C were offers to Elta that were based on the purchase of any equipment from Wei (for such an argument, see, for example, p. 4870, s. 9) - and as stated, this should not be accepted - he did not have a real explanation or satisfaction as to why Harel or Triple C would forward to Wei and to her attention the price quotes that they actually submitted to ELTA. His answers on this matter in his testimony, including to the court's repeated questions, that he did not focus on it, were evasive and raised question marks (p. 4488, paras. 15-4491, paras. 12; p. 4866, s. 12 - p. 4870, s. 18). Moreover, Oshri testified that when he accepted the offer that Triple C had submitted to Elta (P/294, P/15), he felt comfortable that he understood that Triple C had lost the advantage it could have had in submitting an EMC storage system and that it was in an inferior position in all that was said in a NetApp storage system (P. 4483, S. 7-12, P. 4484, S. 1-12). However, even this does not explain why Triple C would forward the proposal that it submitted, and why the details of its proposal would be available to Wei, in a manner that could enable Levi to direct its moves vis-à-vis Elta and Mordechai, and against whom Wei continued to act in connection with Balam Indra, at the very same time and in the days following (N/117).