Ms. Cohen admitted in her affidavit of answers to her questionnaire that she and her spouse received the sale agreement and the sharing agreement a few days before the signing meeting (see: Ms. Cohen's answers in paragraphs 3(1)(2) (apparently there was a clerical error in her answer and the paragraph number should be 3(a)(2)) as well as in paragraph 4(a)(2) of the affidavit of answers, at pages 2784-2785, Appendix 159 to the appendices to the defendants' affidavits. The questions themselves are found on pages 2806 and 2808 of the appendices to the defendants' affidavits, respectively). In her cross-examination, Ms. Cohen also confirmed that she had received the sale agreement a few days before the signing meeting in order to review it. She also admitted that the couple had reviewed the agreements before the signing meeting, but not carefully, and that they did not understand some of the things that she understands today (p. 442, S. 29-28).
Mr. Cohen initially claimed in his testimony that they had received the agreements on the same day, but later in his interrogation, after he was confronted with the fact that his wife had admitted in her testimony that they had received the sale agreement a few days before the signing, he was finally forced to admit that it was indeed so, and that they had gone through it before the meeting (p. 457, S. 24 - 458, S. 24). Mr. Cohen also admitted in his testimony that after reviewing the agreements, "on the face of it, I did not see anything very unusual" (p. 458, S. 18).
- Ron Kobel (plaintiff 32), who testified on his behalf and on behalf of his partner Sharon Kobel (plaintiff 33), admitted in his affidavit that he had received the agreements at his request, after he signed the joining form, and four days before the signing meeting, and that he had reviewed them in general (see: paragraph 4 of his affidavit). In his testimony, Mr. Kobel also repeated similar statements (see pp. 341-342), and noted that "I have read them to the best of my understanding" (p. 342, Q. 7).
- Yehoshua Geva (plaintiff 52), who testified on his behalf and on behalf of his wife, Mrs. Gili Yehoshua (plaintiff 53), claimed in his affidavit (at paragraph 11) that he had not received any written material before the signing meeting, and that they did not know what they were going to sign.
On the other hand, in his testimony, he was forced to admit that they had received the sale agreement in advance and negotiated it, and that the agreement had even been changed at their request before the signing meeting, and that they had consulted about it with a friend who is a law student (p. 92, S. 23 - 93, S. 4; 93, S. 29 - 94, S. 9).