Caselaw

Civil Case (Haifa) 73247-09-24 Tzachi Tarazi v. Carmel Porkosh - part 3

September 2, 2026
Print

"          [...]

10.1 The plaintiff will claim that, as stated, in or about May 2021, he sold together with Carmel to the company - the defendant the "Saltia" business, for which the defendant was supposed to pay the sum of ILS 170,000 to the partnership, in such a way that the plaintiff would have been entitled to a refund of 50%, i.e., receipt of the sum of ILS 85,000.  The plaintiff will claim that some time earlier, the plaintiff had invested the sum of ILS 235,000, while Carmel had invested the sum of ILS 150,000 in the partnership!

The plaintiff will claim that the partnership issued a tax invoice for the sale of the partnership to the defendant, but the defendant never paid this amount to the partnership, and in any case the plaintiff did not receive from the partnership his share - which is half of the partnership in the sum of ILS 85,000, together with linkage differences and interest in accordance with the law from June 1,2021 until the full payment is actually made.  As of the date of filing the claim, the total amounts to ILS 101,475.  [...]."

And:

"The total salary claimed under sections 9 to 10 above:

[...]

11.8.  In accordance with clause 10.1 - debt for the sale of the business to the company: a sum of ILS 85,000 together with linkage differences and interest as required by law from June 1,2021 until the actual full payment.  As of the date of filing the claim, the total amounts to ILS 101,475. 

This remedy was included in a legal proceeding, which was addressed in the framework of a judgment that applies - estoppel of cause.

  1. Conclusion:

The law of the claim for the provision of accounts is dismissed.

The claim for compensation in the amount of ILS 235,000 for indemnification and/or compensation for the investment in the partnership with Carmel is dismissed.

The plaintiff will update, within 30 days from today, (days off in the number of days) how he chooses to act in relation to the other components of the claim, including:

  • the tort of perjury and/or the tort of accessibility, was mentioned in paragraph 4 of the statement of claim;
  • Breach of the obligations and obligations of a trustee in violation of the provisions of the Trust Law, section 19.1 of the statement of claim;
  • breach of the trust agreement in contravention of the provision of section 39 of the Contracts Law, section 19.2 of the statement of claim;
  • The tort of negligence, section 19.3.1 of the statement of claim;
  • tort of sending hands, section 19.3.2 of the statement of claim;
  • tort of theft, section 19.3.3 of the statement of claim;
  • fraudulent tort, section 19.3.4 of the statement of claim;
  • tort of breach of statutory duty, section 19.3.5 of the statement of claim;
  • Health and mental damage, paragraph 19.5 of the statement of claim) .

Lack of a position is tantamount to agreeing to delete the rest of the lawsuit. 

  1. As for expenses at the end of the proceeding, each party may submit a summary of arguments in the scope of 2 pages.

The Secretariat will provide the judgment to the parties and set for an internal reminder.

Previous part123
4Next part
Skip to content