Conversation No. 343 of October 3, 2018 (recording of the conversation) - A conversation between the defendant and the woman, in which the defendant says that she will only be able to bring in another couple in mid-November. The defendant testified that they preferred not to rent to women, nor to men, but to families (p. 593).
Call No. 535 of October 4, 2018 - A conversation between the defendant and a woman who wanted to rent a unit in the motel. The defendant said that everything was occupied until the end of November. The defendant testified that it was not possible to rent it due to renovation or spraying, and not necessarily that the motel was full (p. 593).
Call No. 647 of October 5, 2018 - A conversation between the defendant and a woman who asked to rent a unit in a motel, and the defendant replied that she needed to check with the diary.
Call No. 739 of October 6, 2018 - A similar conversation that the defendant has with a woman who is interested in renting a unit in a motel, and the defendant replies that everything is occupied until November. With regard to the last two conversations, the defendant claimed that this does not mean that the units were occupied, but that the defendant is a businesswoman who knows how to conduct herself and perceives with her sharp senses the person in front of her in the phone call (p. 594).
Conversation No. 697 of October 5, 2018 - A conversation between the defendant and a man who is interested in the unit on the third floor of the motel at a price of $100 per night. The defendant replies that on the 9th of the month the unit is occupied. In relation to this conversation as well, the defendant tried to claim that this does not mean that the unit was indeed occupied (p. 595).
Conversation No. 1016 of October 8, 2018 - A conversation between the defendant and a woman named Shlomit, in which there is a reference to full occupancy and prices - between ₪80 and ₪130 per night plus NIS 150 for the cleaner at the end of the period. The defendant testified that it is possible that the defendant did not want to rent to that woman, and therefore raised the price (p. 595).