Caselaw

Criminal Case (Center) 6040-07-20 State of Israel v. Arkadi Shkovitzky - part 48

October 12, 2026
Print

Cross-examination

  1. The witness did not remember the details of the incident and should have reviewed the police interrogation in order to remember who paid him (p. 84). It is also possible that the defendant paid him for work (p. 85). In the villa he met only the defendant (p. 86).
  2. The witness did not recall who spoke to him on behalf of Tavorinsky in connection with the work (p. 88). The witness does not know whether the defendant instructed Tavorinsky to pay for the work in the villa (p. 88).

Testimony of Michael Hassidian (transcript of December 21, 2021)

  1. Hassidian is a civil engineer who worked in the years 2016-2017 at D.B.S., pricing projects and supervising their implementation (p. 570).
  2. During the testimony, counsel for the accuser referred to a number of exhibits:

P/96 - Ordering Frame No. 4501195431 issued by the IPS in honor of D.B.S., for arranging roofing for the kitchen of Hasharon Prison, NIS 41, 964, NIS 16.

P/97 - Price Quote of D.B.S. P.A. 41, NIS 964.16 for "Roofing the Sharon Kitchen Building". This document does not contain any work related to communication or computerization (p. 572).

P/98 - D.B.S.'s bookkeeping card report, on the fourth page (marked A.M.9) under the heading "IPS: 4501195431 Hasharon Prison" there is, among other things, a payment line to Genkin, a payment in the amount of NIS 3,300 (an amount that plus 17% VAT amounts to NIS 3,861 - M.B.), reference date 29.5.2016, target date 14.6.2016, reference 1089, details - "Computer Communications in Hasharon Prison". To the question of Genkin's connection, the witness noted that he was a communications contractor, but there was no mention of communications work (p. 573).

P/29 - The tax invoice issued by Genkin in respect of communications work at 2 Hemed St., Rishon LeZion, the subject of this indictment. To the question of what is the connection between this work and the kitchen roofing project at Hasharon Prison, the witness replied that there is no connection (p. 574).

Previous part1...4748
49...138Next part
Skip to content