Following this answer, he was asked if he remembered the diagonal movement of the vehicle involvedSo apparently the reason for the deviation was not indirect, and he replied:
"I think she was overtaking, I don't know how to say it for sure, but I don't have any explanation for why she suddenly appeared in the lane in front of me.
...
Q. I show you a picture of the accident scene from the direction of your drive, and you can see that it is not possible to see the traffic in front of you before the collision, so how did you explain that you saw its movement into your lane?
A. There were lights in my path." (P/43, S, 83,68,81).
Our eyes see that the defendant began to get into trouble with his answers during his police interrogation when confronted that he did not at all He could see the vehicle involved and certainly couldn't see the movement of her car before the accident and therefore couldn't know if it was overtaking or swerving.
In his testimony in court, the defendant testified in his main interrogation, among other things, what happened in the accident because:
"... Suddenly a car appears in front of me, whose lights I can see only until the moment of the collision..." (See his testimony of April 1,2026, p. 96, paras. 20-21).
Later in his cross-examination, the defendant testified:
"Q. You claim that you were driving in the direction of your journey and then saw the lights in front of you, because of the lights in front of you, do you conclude that you were driving in your lane?
A. I don't conclude, I know that I drove in my lane, not because of the lights, the lights were just in front of me, I'm driving in my lane for the simple reason that I'm supposed to drive in my lane. I see a car coming out in front of me, I see the lights..." (See his testimony of April 1,2026, p. 104, paras. 20-24).
As a result, the defendant was asked by the court whether he remembered the moment of the accident and the collision, and he testified:
"To the court's question, do you remember the moment of the accident? Do you remember the moment of the collision?
Witness: (The witness delays answering)I don't remember.
To Beyham's question"Q, if you don't remember the moment of the accident and if you don't remember the
The Instinctive ResponseSo maybe you don't remember that you deviated either?
Witness: That's not trueI did not deviate." (See his testimony of April 1,2026, pp. 104-105, para. 27
28,1-3).
It is puzzling if the defendant does not remember the accident and the moment of the collision, as he testified accordingly
To the Court's QuestionHow can it be said that the leadership involved is the one that necessarily swerved into the path?
His journey or alternatively was in overtaking. This is not the case, but that the defendant is doing everything in his power in order to
to distance himself from the accusation attributed to him, and in any case there is no dispute that his version that the
She strayed into his path, was contradicted by findings found at the scene on the road and in other testimonies.