The sequence of events in the case
An indictment was filed against the defendant on Day 1.05.2024.
The case is set for a hearing on the 23rd6.24. Before another panel, but due to changes in work arrangements in the court, the hearing was transferred to this panel.
A power of attorney was submitted to the court file by the lawyer representing the defendant.
The defendant's counsel submitted to the court file on the 14th10.24. The defense's response to the indictment.
In the defense's response to the indictment, the defendant admitted to driving at the time and place, denying responsibility for the accident and the causal connection between the accident and death. In the defense's response, the defendant admitted to sections 1-3 of the indictment.
II"The defendant claims that there was poor visibility due to rain and that the range of vision from where the defendant arrived due to a curve to the right does not allow the defendant to be seen or visible.
The defendant denies the deviation as described in the indictment.
The defendant claims that the driver involved completed the overtaking And she was in a deviation into his path.
It should be noted, that on June 29,2025, during the course of the management of the evidence at the stage of a defense case, the defendant's counsel filed a motion under section 108 regarding the procedures of the Israel Police in relation to the seizure, examination, penetration and production of CDR and EDR devices.
In the hearing of the day 107.25. After reviewing the application under section 108, this panel ruled in the decision that since the hearing of the defense expert's testimony regarding the dismantling of the airbag computer in the vehicle had already begun before the application under section 108 was filed, I did not see fit to set a date for a hearing on the application under section 108, before the defense expert's testimony was heard, and therefore the evidentiary hearing for the continuation of the defense expert's testimony would remain in place.