As mentioned above, Examiner Tsabari's cross-examination continued over an additional hearing (hearing of February 6,2025).
The examiner confirmed, because the computer of the Kia car involved is not supported by the police and therefore it is impossible to unload data from it to the police system.
The examiner confirmed, that he saw that the defendant's attorney approached the prosecution in order to check the computer of the Kia car involved and to obtain data from it, provided that there was electricity in the car, by an expert on his behalf.
The examiner confirmed, that the Israel Police dismantled the computer of the defendant's car. To the question of why they did not dismantle the computer of the vehicle involved, he testified:
"Because we don't disassemble computers from which we know we can't extract data. We have no interest in disassembling a computer from the car when we can't read the data from it." (See his testimony of February 6,2025, p. 76, paras. 1-2).
The examiner was asked why he did not contact the manufacturer of the Kia that they will dismantle, replied that it is not CDR certified.
He testified that when he needs to get data, he turns to the examiners who are qualified to do so, and they tell him whether it is possible to unload data or not.In his words:
"... As soon as the examiner who is a CDR expert tells me that it is impossible to unload this computer, that, as far as I am concerned, ends the treatment of the CDR of that vehicle. If the defense has additional questions about CDR or whether it is possible to unload data that I am not familiar with, I cannot answer those questions." (See his testimony of February 6,2025, p. 76, paras. 23-26).
The examiner confirmed that a certified examiner of the Israel Police dismantled the computer of the defendant's car.
To the question of why the examiner Tal Bracha, who is a certified examiner, was unable to unload data from the defendant's car computer, replied that the appropriate cable had not arrived according to the vehicle manufacturer. The examiner's memorandum was marked N/3.