The eyewitness Ayalon was confronted with the discrepancy between his testimony and the findings of the accident on the ground, and it was evident that he could not explain the difference between the way he saw the defendant's car enter their lane at a 90-degree angle and therefore According to him, the accident is a front on the side, and the manner in which the accident actually occurred and the damages on the ground indicate that it was an accident close to the accident of the front on the front.
Another gap exists between the testimony of the witness Ayalon and the findings on the ground, in that Ayalon testified that the driver of the mixed vehicle swerved slightly to the left, and this was inconsistent with the grooves in the right-turn road, according to the determination of Examiner Maayan.
Forest, because this is a civilian who is an eyewitness to the accident and not an expert witness.
I have found it appropriate in this matter to bring similar things that have been said Civil Appeal (Traffic Be'er Sheva) 414/09, Southern District Attorney's Office v. Binyamin Chopin, given on June 30,2011, by the Honorable Senior Judge Alon Ophir:
"A decision on the question of the witness Alon's version versus the conclusions of the examiner in the case -
While the witness Alon describes the accident as a quick and immediate event between the moment he noticed that another vehicle was in his lane and until the impact occurred, prosecution expert Sharon Solomon argues for a different mechanism of accident.
Years of Experience Shows that witnesses usually remember actions that they themselves performed during the incident... However, witnesses themselves involved in the accident find it difficult to clearly describe what they saw during a quick and sharp accident. (See in this regard the book by the Honorable Justice Yaakov Bashan, Road Accident Research - Decoding and Reconstruction, on page 36) In contrast to the situation of this witness, there is a traffic examiner who investigated the scene of the accident after it occurred, collected findings, took measurements, adjusted damages and reached conclusions as a result of findings he found and collected at the scene.