Conclusion, the examiner's explanations that this was an optical error on the part of the eyewitness Ayalon Zadok due to the route of the road, the exit from a curve, and the lack of lighting in the area, a dark road, are acceptable to me and are sufficient to provide a professional response to the gaps between the testimony of Ayalon and Zadok and the findings on the ground and the damage to the vehicles in relation to the manner in which the accident occurred, to the fact that the accident was not a side façade but a front with an angle, and that he claimed that the vehicle involved had swerved to the left before the accident.
This is a misinterpretation by the witness The swerving of a vehicle involved to the left due to the collision and the fact that he testified that the defendant's vehicle appeared upside down in the air, but in fact the defendant's vehicle turned and stopped in the opposite direction of travel.
As mentioned above, the reason for the discrepancies according to the examiner's explanations is that the eyewitness testifies to the things that he perceived with his senses in fractions of a second and in the dark.
Testimony of the witness Ayalon Zadok, is the testimony of an eyewitness and is not the testimony of an expert who is familiar with road accidents and the study of accident scenes.
In my opinionThe discrepancies that arise from the testimony of eyewitness Ayalon Zadok and the manner in which the accident actually occurred, do not invalidate the entire testimony of the eyewitness Ayalon and the credibility I give to parts of his testimony relating to the fact that the driver involved was in her lane, that the defendant was the one who swerved into their lane of travel and that the accident occurred in their lane, also in light of the fact that these parts are consistent with the findings from the field (the grooves and the distribution of the parts), with the conclusions of the experiment conducted by the examiner to examine the witness's field of vision in order to check the reliability of his testimony, and with the additional testimony of the prosecution witnesses involved in the accident.