Caselaw

Labor Dispute (Haifa) 25884-09-24 Khaldun Hamdan – Tair Hassan - part 13

October 8, 2026
Print

[65] Paragraph 26 of the plaintiff's affidavit; transcript of the minutes of the hearing dated January 28,2026, p. 12, line 34.

[66] Transcript of the minutes of the hearing dated January 28,2026, p. 32, lines 3-5; p. 50, lines 28-38; p. 51, lines 3-5.

[67] Transcript of the recording of the conversation, p. 4, lines 9-17.

[68] The parties disagreed as to the transcription of the conversation, and each party submitted its own version.  The defendant also claimed that the document submitted by the plaintiff was not lawfully prepared, since the transcription was prepared by an employee of the plaintiff's attorney's office, and not by an authorized person.  We see no need to address this dispute, and since the two versions ultimately help the defendant (regarding the specific point of termination of the employment relationship), and not the plaintiff.

[69] Labor Appeal (National) 38313-03-18 Ilan Israeli Association for Injured Children - Mohdinov (given June 1,2020).

[70] Section 16E of the statement of claim.

[71] Request for Leave to Appeal (National) 53583-01-17 Supercom Ltd.  - Missenstein (given on February 24,2017).

[72] Paragraph 60 of the defendant's summaries.

[73] Labor Appeal (National) 137/08 Islands vs.  Friedman Hakhshori Engineering and Construction Company Ltd.  (given on August 22,2010).

[74] National Labor Court Hearing (National) 56/283-3 Chicken Tena Industries (1991) Ltd.  - Kabaha (given on October 29,1996).

[75] Labor Appeal (National) 778/06 Tyashchuk vs.  White Snow (1980) Ltd.  (given on May 28,2007).

[76] Labor Appeal (National) 1268/04 Elkayam - State of Israel (given February 5,2006).

[77] Labor Appeal (National) 28228-03-15 Lux-Zissman (given on October 31,2016).

 

Previous part1...1213
Skip to content