בית המשפט העליון אישר החלטה של בית המשפט המחוזי בחיפה שלא למנות בורר בסכסוך בין צדדים אשר ההסכם ביניהם כלל סעיף בוררות. נקבע כי לבית המשפט סמכות שלא לכבד הסכם בוררות, גם אם ישתמש בה במשורה, כאשר חילוקי הדעות שאליהם התכוונו הצדדים שיוכרעו על ידי בורר, הם חילוקי דעות שאינם מתאימים לסוג הבורר שבחרו. במקרה זה סעיף הבוררות נועד לעסוק בשאלות בתחום ההנדסה המצריכות מומחיות מקצועית בתחום זה על מנת להכריע בהן בעוד שהשאלות שעלו בסופו של דבר היו שאלות משפטיות בדבר התיישנות ומעשה בית דין בהם בורר בתחום ההנדסה לא יוכל להכריע ועל כן רשאי בית המשפט למנות בורר שהוא משפטן ולא מהנדס.
Published in Afik News 049 14.05.2010
Related articles
A car import license may be denied renewal also based only on industry-wide competition considerations, and not due to any act or omission by the importer
Competition
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
The Ministry of Transport refused to renew the direct import licenses of a motorcycle importer for both Yamaha and Kawasaki brands, ruling that the license could only be renewed for one of them. The Supreme Court dismissed the importer’s appeal on competition grounds. The Israeli Law for the Licensing of Services and Professions in the […]
In the absence of a written document in a real estate transaction, the official recording prevails over oral agreements
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
Following a family dispute, a father moved to evict his son from a residential apartment in his ownership after the son and his family resided in the property for years without payment of consideration and without a written agreement. The Court granted the eviction claim. A commitment to grant a gift in real estate is […]
Favoring associates in the provision of services does not constitute prohibited discrimination under law
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
An individual evacuated from his home following the outbreak of the “Swords of Iron” war and accommodated in a hotel was demanded to move to another hotel, for reasons of required renovations while a group of evacuees associated with a hotel employee was allowed to stay. The Supreme Court rejected the contention of illegal discrimination. […]
Mutual transfer of rights between relatives in a partition of property is not a “transfer without consideration” and may trigger a betterment levy
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Taxation and Government Incentives and Funding
Dispute Resolution
A brother and sister, who received three apartments from their father as a gift and recorded them under joint ownership, signed a partition agreement. Under the agreement, they transferred rights to one another to establish exclusive ownership of each apartment (“distribution in kind”), but refused to pay a betterment levy, contending that the transfer was […]