ישראלי הגיש בקשה לאישור תביעה ייצוגית נגד חברה אמריקאית, זאת על אף שבית המשפט בארה"ב כבר אישר הסדר פשרה עמה באותה סוגיה בארה"ב. בית המשפט העליון קבע, כי על מנת שחברה האמריקאית תבסס קיומו של מעשה בית דין על פסק הדין שניתן בארה"ב להיקלט בישראל על פי חוק אכיפת פסקי חוץ. נקבע, כי בנסיבות דנן יש להכיר בפסק החוץ שניתן בארה"ב הואיל ולבית המשפט הזר הייתה סמכות, להליך הייצוגי היה קשר מהותי לארה"ב וכן טענות התובע הייצוגי לפגיעה בזכות חברי הקבוצה בישראל להליך הוגן כבר נדונו בבית המשפט בארה"ב ונדחו. לאור האמור, הבקשה לאישור תובענה ייצוגית שאושרה בישראל נדחתה ונקבע יש להכיר בפסק הזר המאשר את הסדר הפשרה בהליך הייצוגי בארה"ב כמעשה בית דין לפי הדין בארה"ב המונע פתיחת הליך הייצוגי בארץ.
Published in Afik News 176 15.04.2015
Related articles
A Claim That a Contract Clause is Merely a Sham Requires a High Standard of Proof
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
An agreement for the provision of furniture transport and assembly services existed between two companies, which either party was entitled to terminate with 60 days’ notice. After several years, the transport company requested to replace the agreement with an engagement with a sister company but because the sister company required this in order to finance […]
Ownership of funds deposited into a bank account prior to adding a partner is determined by the intent behind the addition, rather than the act itself
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Domestic Relations
Notarial wills and testaments
A son was joined as a partner tohis parent’s bank account. And after their demise contended ownership of the funds in the account. The Court held that adding the son to the account was done solely for convenience and without the intention of granting him the funds as a gift. The Israeli Gift Law and […]
A company providing service and support in Israel to a foreign company may be considered its representative for the purpose of service of process in Israel
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
A client whose investment account with a foreign company was blocked, served a statement of claim to the Israeli company through which the account was opened. The Israeli company contended that it is not authorized to receive service of process on behalf of the foreign company since it only provides technical support. The Court held […]
A non-compete clause does not automatically become void upon termination of the contract but will be evaluated in light of the circumstances
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A store chain owner suspected that one of the franchisees secretly became a shareholder in a competing store chain using his brother as a “straw man”. Following these suspicions, the chain terminated the franchise agreements for two branches and for the third branch demanded to activate a “forced separation” mechanism due to “breach of trust.” […]