Use of corporate veil as a mere “pipeline” to transfer funds will justify piercing the corporate veil

Waiters employed at the luxury restaurant “Segev” received their salary from a shared tips pool. In 2019, the restaurant unilaterally decided, without the employees’ consent, to deduct 20% from the tips to fund social benefits and related contributions. The employees objected to the change and even took organizational steps to oppose it. The National Labor […]

A man founded a company with a name that includes his full name. Thereafter, members of his family founded a company with a name that also includes the shared surname and deals in the same areas of activity. However, after decades of activity and an agreement between the parties that the first company would be […]

A parties signed a lease agreement alongside a document entitled ‘Option to Purchase a Property’ which stipulated that the apartment will be sold during the lease period or at the end thereof and the parties will jointly act to finalize a sale contract. In practice, the lessor did not agree to make any changes to […]

A controlling shareholder in a company was added as a party to an arbitration proceeding, even though he is not personally a party to the arbitration agreement, but rather the company. The Supreme Court held that there was no reason to add the controlling shareholder to the arbitration proceeding by virtue of piercing the corporate […]