AFIK & Co.
Attorneys & Notaries
The Firm
About the Firm
Dedicated In-House Solutions
Inspired by Core Values
Fields of Practice
Latam – Spain – Israel Activities
Notarial Services
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
“Soft landing” services in Israel
European Law and Regulations
Data Protection Officer (DPO) Services
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Mergers and Acquisitions
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Real estate in Israel and around the world
High-Tech and Technology
Cryptocurrency, NFT and Web-3
Intergenerational Law (Trusts, Estates, Lasting Powers of Attorney, Parenting)
Labor Law
Maritime, Aviation and Transportation Law
Taxation and Government Incentives and Funding
Competition
Public Law, Elections Law and Tenders
Criminal Law
White-Collar Crimes
Military Law and Disciplinary Procedures in the Police and Prison Service
Traffic Law
Education and College Disciplinary Matters
“Soft landing” services in Israel
Notarial Services
Notarial Services
Apostillization and Execution of Documents for Use Outside Israel
Mobile Israeli Notary Services Outside of Israel
The Services and 2026 Rates fixed by the Ministry of Justice
Publications
Articles
Afik News Magazine
Legal Updates
Media Publications
Our team
English
עברית
Contact us
Legal Updates
Managing a company in a situation of a shareholders dispute will be with prior written agreement only
August 20, 2010
Print
Share
Published in
Afik New 056 20.08.2010
Print
Share
Related articles
May 31, 2026
Approval of CEO compensation via over-ruling requires addressing shareholders’ opposition
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Dispute Resolution
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
After the general assembly of shareholders in a public company rejected the decision of the compensation committee and the board of directors of the company to grant the CEO a special bonus that deviates from the company’s compensation policy, the bonus was approved via an “overruling” decision. The Court dismissed the company’s motion for summary […]
May 24, 2026
Unilateral withdrawal of corporate funds by the controlling shareholder may be deemed minority oppression
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Labor Law
A minority shareholder contended that the controlling shareholder excluded her from the company’s operations, created fictitious debts toward her and treated her in a manner amounting to shareholder oppression. The controlling shareholder contended that it acted lawfully within its authority as the sole director and that the minority shareholder knew in advance that she would […]
April 1, 2026
A Company is not obligated by a shareholders agreement unless it adopted it into its articles of association
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
Minority shareholders in a company sought to halt the implementation of a board of directors’ resolution to establish a data center requiring a major investment by the company, as they contended that the decision breaches the shareholders agreement, constitutes a deviation from the company’s fields of activity and amounts to minority oppression. The Court held […]
March 30, 2026
Even a ‘finder’ type middleman is required to prove being the efficient factor of the transaction to be entitled to a commission
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
Commercial, Banking and Financial
A company entered into a finder’s fee agreement with a middleman, under which it committed to pay him a commission in exchange for establishing a connection between the company and an investor who would invest in it or its affiliates. Approximately seven years after the contact initiated by the middleman between the company and a […]
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Whatsapp