AFIK & Co.
Attorneys & Notary
The Firm
About the Firm
Dedicated In-House Solutions
Inspired by Core Values
Fields of Practice
Latam – Spain – Israel Activities
Notarial Services
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
“Soft landing” services in Israel
European Law and Regulations
Data Protection Officer (DPO) Services
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Mergers and Acquisitions
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Real estate in Israel and around the world
High-Tech and Technology
Cryptocurrency, NFT and Web-3
Intergenerational Law (Trusts, Estates, Lasting Powers of Attorney, Parenting)
Labor Law
Maritime, Aviation and Transportation Law
Taxation and Government Incentives and Funding
Competition
Public Law, Elections Law and Tenders
Criminal Law
White-Collar Crimes
Military Law and Disciplinary Procedures in the Police and Prison Service
Traffic Law
Education and College Disciplinary Matters
“Soft landing” services in Israel
Notarial Services
Notarial Services
Apostillization and Execution of Documents for Use Outside Israel
Mobile Israeli Notary Services Outside of Israel
The Services and 2026 Rates fixed by the Ministry of Justice
Publications
Articles
Newsletter
Legal Updates
Press
Our team
English
עברית
Contact us
Legal Updates
Managing a company in a situation of a shareholders dispute will be with prior written agreement only
August 20, 2010
Print
Share
Published in
Afik New 056 20.08.2010
Print
Share
Related articles
December 24, 2025
When ESOP are subject to terms to be agreed one cannot invalidate an employment agreement because of disappointment of the offered option terms
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
High-Tech and Technology
Labor Law
A startup company employed a scientist. The employment agreement stipulated that intellectual property belonged to the company and that the issue of employee stock options would be settled later. After 8 months, a dispute arose regarding the option terms (the company’s requirement for a vesting period and actual work), the scientist decided to go on […]
December 22, 2025
Personal responsibility cannot be played on a CEO through piercing of the corporate veil if he is not an actual shareholder.
Labor Law
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
The widow of a company employee sought to sue the company and its CEO, who she contended to be a hidden controlling shareholder, after pension contributions were not made for the employee during his employment period. The Court held that the corporate veil cannot be pierced and that personal liability should not be imposed on […]
December 18, 2025
In strict liability offenses, an officer will not be held liable if he acted by reasonable means to prevent the offense
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Criminal Law
Several officers of a corporation were charged with various breaches of fiduciary duty due to the operation of a pirated waste disposal site without a license and without proper infrastructure, while causing severe environmental hazards. The Court held that only some of the officers were guilty of breaching fiduciary duty imposed on them as officers. […]
December 16, 2025
A business partnership requires substantive intent to partner and participation in the venture’s risks
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A business consultant claimed to be a partner in a business venture of an industrial design company and demanded access to financial data and a share of the profits. The Court rejected the claim regarding the existence of a partnership and held that the relationship between the parties was strictly a principal-contractor relationship and not […]
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Whatsapp