Published in Afik News 172 18.02.2015
Related articles
In the absence of a written agreement system the financial conduct and economic interest of the parties will be examined
Mergers and Acquisitions
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
Investors transferred sums of money to company owners, based on acquaintance and prior friendship between the parties, for the purpose of the company’s activities. The investors contended that the funds were transferred as a loan which the shareholders of the company are required to repay, while the shareholders contended that the funds constitute a business […]
A license for a generic product issued by an EU Agency may be considered hindrance to EU Competition law if granted to a single company
European Law and Regulations
Dispute Resolution
A medical distributor received a license from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) under the appropriate regulatory framework. A competitor petitioned the EMA for revocation of the license, as it contented that the grant of the license, although not exclusive, disrupts the fairness of the market within the economic union, due to the fact that the […]
The war in Ukraine is a justified reason for issuing an urgent temporary injunction to prevent triggering of autonomous guarantees
International Transactions and Dispute Resolution
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A municipal water corporation in the city of Kharkiv, Ukraine, demanded to execute payment of over ILS 31 million under autonomous guarantees given to it by an Israeli company after an agreement to carry out a water infrastructure project was canceled due to the ongoing war in Ukraine. The District Court granted the motion for […]
A shareholder cannot contend personal damage if another shareholder also suffered damage and it is not a specific damage caused only to him
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
One of two shareholders in a company contended to have suffered personal damage due to the other shareholder entering into agreements with the company which were made behind his back and without his knowledge and that he never received the consideration for them. The Court rejected the claim and held that the damage caused is […]