Published in Afik News 071 16.03.2011
Related articles
When ESOP are subject to terms to be agreed one cannot invalidate an employment agreement because of disappointment of the offered option terms
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
High-Tech and Technology
Labor Law
A startup company employed a scientist. The employment agreement stipulated that intellectual property belonged to the company and that the issue of employee stock options would be settled later. After 8 months, a dispute arose regarding the option terms (the company’s requirement for a vesting period and actual work), the scientist decided to go on […]
A business partnership requires substantive intent to partner and participation in the venture’s risks
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A business consultant claimed to be a partner in a business venture of an industrial design company and demanded access to financial data and a share of the profits. The Court rejected the claim regarding the existence of a partnership and held that the relationship between the parties was strictly a principal-contractor relationship and not […]
To impose personal liability on a corporate organ personal fault must be shown according to a subjective test
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
Property owners entered into a tenancy agreement with a company which was supposed to carry out construction work on the property to open a restaurant and a hotel. After the tenant failed to pay the rent and did not commence the work on the property on time, the property owners terminated the agreement and demanded […]
A partner who terminates a partnership agreement in bad faith may be obligated to pay compensation for loss of entrepreneurial profit
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A farm owner terminated a partnership agreement with a company engaged in the marketing and construction of solar systems in favor of an engagement with a competing company, contending that he was entitled to terminate the partnership agreement at any time. The Court partially accepted the claim and the farm owner is to pay compensation […]