Published in Afik News 077 08.06.2011
Related articles
The Israeli Court is the proper forum to adjudicate a restrictive arrangement, even when all parties to it are foreign corporations
Competition
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
Foreign corporations were sued for damage caused to Israeli consumers due to a restrictive arrangement to which they were parties. Within this framework, they coordinated prices, quantities and bids in the manufacturing of a component integrated into hard drives. The Court held that the Israeli Court is the proper forum to adjudicate the lawsuit. To […]
Entitlement to the grant of options is determined in accordance with the conditions set out in the employment agreement and is subject to their fulfillment
Labor Law
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A senior employee who was terminated from a company demanded to receive 20% of its shares, claiming that according to the employment agreement, he is entitled to 5% of the shares of its subsidiary, which was not actually established, because the value of the employing company is four times the value of the subsidiary. The […]
Attributing a debt to shareholders of a mother company require two processes of piercing the corporate veil
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A manpower agency provided employees to a company operating a nursing home. The nursing home ran into financial difficulties, ceased operations, and owed money to the manpower agency, who demanded them also from a person who was the shareholders of the holding company of the company managing the hotel and the director of the operating […]
A non-compete clause that does not protect a legitimate interest such as a trade secret but is only meant to prevent competition, will be void
Labor Law
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A company engaged in coordinating and managing the collection of development levies for local authorities and water corporations entered into an agreement with a partner, which included broad non-compete and confidentiality clauses. After the partnership between the parties ended, the partner began working in the same field through another company. The Court held that the […]