Published in Afik News 077 08.06.2011
Related articles
Making significant efforts may not be sufficient to exempt a director from criminal liability for operating without a business license.
Criminal Law
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
A director of a company that operated a business for several years without a business license, as required by law, was charged with liability for violating the law, despite the fact that he had made tremendous efforts and worked tirelessly to obtain a business license. The Court held that the director bears criminal liability because […]
A company providing service and support in Israel to a foreign company may be considered its representative for the purpose of service of process in Israel
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
A client whose investment account with a foreign company was blocked, served a statement of claim to the Israeli company through which the account was opened. The Israeli company contended that it is not authorized to receive service of process on behalf of the foreign company since it only provides technical support. The Court held […]
The Israeli Court is the proper forum to adjudicate a restrictive arrangement, even when all parties to it are foreign corporations
Competition
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
Foreign corporations were sued for damage caused to Israeli consumers due to a restrictive arrangement to which they were parties. Within this framework, they coordinated prices, quantities and bids in the manufacturing of a component integrated into hard drives. The Court held that the Israeli Court is the proper forum to adjudicate the lawsuit. To […]
Entitlement to the grant of options is determined in accordance with the conditions set out in the employment agreement and is subject to their fulfillment
Labor Law
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A senior employee who was terminated from a company demanded to receive 20% of its shares, claiming that according to the employment agreement, he is entitled to 5% of the shares of its subsidiary, which was not actually established, because the value of the employing company is four times the value of the subsidiary. The […]