Published in Afik News 083 31.08.2011
Related articles
Failure to pay an employee due to an insolvency due to the Covid-19 epidemic does not justify piercing the corporate veil and personal liabilities of shareholders
Labor Law and Immigration
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A kitchen worker at a restaurant resigned after not being paid his rights. The employee demanded that the company shareholders pay his rights personally by piercing the corporate veil as they are engaged in operating restaurants through the serial establishment of companies, liquidating them and changing the names of the restaurants to avoid debts. The […]
A company filing a claim need show financial robustness and existence of assets is not sufficient for exemption from placing a guarantee
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A company was required to place a guarantee as part of a lawsuit it filed, even though it owns assets worth dozens of times more than the amount of the guarantee. The Court accepted the motion to deposit a guarantee due to company’s failure to meet the threshold required to establish financial stability. When a […]
When a comprehensive agreement is signed to cease joint operation one cannot make a contention for a right stemming from the original agreement
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A party to a joint venture sought funds owed to it by virtue of the original agreements between the parties, despite the fact that the parties signed a separation agreement that regulated the end of their business relationships and conducted a final accounting. This was on the grounds that the reason for receiving those funds […]
The existence of a partnership will be decided according to the essence of the relations that actually existed and not the parties’ original intent
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Labor Law and Immigration
Dispute Resolution
An employee demanded from his employer rights arising from his work for it, despite a partnership agreement signed between the parties before starting his work. The Labor Court accepted the employee’s contention because in practice the employee was not a partner in the partnership that managed the business in which he was employed. The existence […]