Published in Afik News 094 01.02.2012
Related articles
A memorandum of understanding for the sale of a residential house that does not include essential details for the transaction shall not be enforced
Real Estate
Dispute Resolution
Parties signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for the sale of a luxury house in Caesarea, in the amount of ILS 11 million (in which there is many valuable items), subject to signing an agreement. An agreement was never signed and the potential purchasers demanded to enforce the MOU, which they contending to be a […]
A signatory to a document will be deemed to have understood and agreed to the contents even if such were written in a language he does not understand
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
International Transactions and Dispute Resolution
Israeli investors entered into an investment agreement in a Mexican company for the purpose of promoting a real estate project in Mexico. The agreement was written in English while the appendices attached thereto were in Spanish. The Court determined that the language in which the documents were written cannot serve to release the investors from […]
A minority shareholder will not be entitled to a veto if he lacks the skills to manage the company
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A shareholder in a company contended oppression by the other shareholders and demanded to have a right of veto in the board of directors in order to prevent its continuation and transfer all the powers of the board to him, even though he had never been involved in the company’s affairs and lacks to skills […]
Entitlement to brokerage fees arises only when the client signed all documents and the broker was the efficient factor in the transaction
Real Estate
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A real estate broker demanded from property buyers payment of brokerage fees, relying on a partial exclusivity agreement that was executed between them several years before the transaction took place, but beyond this he did not contribute anything. The Court rejected the claim and determined that the exclusivity agreement executed between the parties is invalid. […]