The Court was moved to declare a decision of the board of directors of a company as void under the contention that it was made quickly, without thorough and professional background check. The Court rejected the motion and held that it was not proven that the decisions of the board of directors was made with mala fide or in unreasonableness that requires intervention of the Court. The Court will not replace the discretion of the directors, except in cases where it was proven that a decision was taken arbitrarily or with mala fide. In addition, the Court will take into consideration the implications of cancellation of the decision and the interests of the company. In this case, because the anticipated damage if the decision would be canceled was much higher than in case where the decision will be upheld, it was decided not to interfere with the decision.
Related articles
When the dispute remains alive, a claim for offset can be raised even after the cause of action’s statute of limitation period has expired
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Public Law, Elections Law and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A company sought to offset royalty amounts that were collected in excess from future royalties to the Israel Land Authority. This was done in light of the fact that the statute of limitation period for the cause of action for the collection in excess expired and the Israel Land Authority knew that the company maintains […]
Purchasers who lawfully rescinded a contract are entitled to restitution of consideration at the real value based on the apartment’s current market price
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
Apartment purchasers filed an action against a contractor demanding the rescission of the sale agreement and restitution of the consideration, after they were provided with a non-compliant parking space that could not be reasonably utilized. The Court accepted the claim for rescission of the agreement and held that the breaches by the contractor were fundamental […]
A framework relationship contract is a general agreement that is open to changes and updates in matters that the parties to the contract have chosen not to settle in advance
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Holders of rights of residential units in a luxury hotel demanded the hotel owners to appoint an internationally renowned management company to manage the hotel as well as refrain from raising the management fees. The Supreme Court held that the agreement is a closed agreement and there is no reason to obligate or prevent the […]
A negative past record may result in the disqualification of a tender bid
Public Law, Elections Law and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A tenders committee disqualified a sole bid in a tender for the provision of cleaning services due to the bidder’s negative past record. The Court dismissed the petition and held that the tenders committee’s decision to reject the bid based on the negative record was free of flaw. Intervention in the professional discretion of the […]