"Adv. Gerson: ... That means you started negotiations with Switch Up when the lease agreement with Klada was still in effect, right?
The witness, Adv. Weinstein: Clada's lease agreement, we gave you opportunities to amend it and you didn't fix it.
Adv. Gerson: Okay, okay.
The witness, Adv. Weinstein: And we saw that it was going to its end, we gave you a few more of that. By the way, if you had corrected the violations, there would have been no agreement. It was signed only after all the additions of more times and more times and more times. This means that if you had repaired, there would have been no agreement with them"
(p. 58, lines 5-13, emphasis added - p. R.).
- As stated, I give full confidence to the testimony of the company's attorney and accept her version that if the defendants had paid the rent within the extension times given to them to correct the violations, the agreement with the new tenant would not have been signed. This is consistent with the testimony of Ido Porat, the CEO of the new tenant, who described the matter as follows:
"... And we go around with all kinds of brokers and realtors in the city and we set an eye on this property and tried to contact the owner of the property, we didn't succeed for a long time we couldn't reach them at all and we came to them I remember it was right during Corona they said that this property is rented to a hotel restaurant something like that, it's properties that we really like the properties, we have a lot of properties in this style and we approached again and again and again and again and again andThey kept saying that it was rented and that it was rented and that it was rented, and we couldn't even reach them, really such a secret company they are not famous, it's not Azrieli. In the end, somehow we connect, we are also from the Fatel Group, we managed to reach the owners. We met at a meeting and they said,
Adv. Gerson: Who is the owner?