Investigator Malichi testified that the commander of the Central Intelligence Unit entered the room with him, Defendant 2 asked him if he would protect him and his family if he told the truth, the commander of the Intelligence Unit asked him if he was connected to the murder, and when he answered in the negative, he was told that if he was not connected he had an obligation as a citizen to tell the truth, and that if he did, the commander of the Intelligence Unit would do everything possible to protect him within the framework of the law. At this point, Defendant 2 began to talk about the incident, the conversation unfolded, and "at a certain point it was impossible to stop it... You don't know where, when to stop. And then at a certain point I did realize that he was connected to the murder. So it was already too late, it was already at the stage when he gave it his all." According to him, he then interrogated Defendant 2 under a warning, informed him of his rights, and Defendant 2 did not want to consult a lawyer (p. 94).
In his cross-examination, Investigator Malichi confirmed that the memorandum showed that after Defendant 2 asked what would happen to him, he was the first to mention the murder, when he told Defendant 2 that they knew everything about him and knew that he was connected to the murder; and explained that he had told him this as food for thought so that he would tell the truth in the next interrogation, since Investigator Benita had told him that he had not told the truth in the interrogation. However, he clarified that at this stage they had nothing to link Defendant 2 to the murder, except that Defendant 1 said that he was with him, but "I said these things so that maybe he knew something about the murder... Maybe he will tell the truth. That's all" (pp. 96-100).
According to him, as he stated in the memorandum, he informed the commander of the Intelligence Unit that Defendant 2 wanted to tell him that he had witnessed the murder and asked for a promise that he would be guarded, so they went in together. Regarding the fact that he was not warned, the interrogator reiterated that at this stage he did not know that Defendant 2 was about to say that he was involved in the murder, since he claimed that he was not connected to the murder and before that he had only told him that he knew who had murdered him; But when he began to tell the story , "It unfolded, there was no stage where it could be stopped... It was so fast and nothing, we didn't stop" (pp. 100-102).