In his cross-examination, the witness Yoav Barkan clarified that on that date a search was conducted around the vehicle and the search radius was expanded, but no blood was found other than blood on the socks (pp. 293-294); and he rejected the claim that the scene of the incident (which was discovered only the next day, during the reconstruction conducted for defendant 1), was only about 20 meters away from the place where the vehicle was found, and claimed that it was "tens if not hundreds of meters" away (pp. 295-296).
When asked if a stone was found inside the sock found at the site, he replied, "I read from my worksheets, socks, socks within socks that are torn in the same place with no burn marks, inside the sock is a hard white material, maybe plastic or maybe plaster. I'm not a geologist and I don't know how to tell you exactly what was inside, but it's also possible that the material that was inside came out of the hole, because the socks had a hole in them, I, when I checked the socks at the scene, there was no stone in them... I know that I examined the socks and I did not identify a large stone, I identified a hard white substance" (p. 297).
Additional artifact evidence was seized during the reconstruction conducted for defendant 1 on 28 February 2018, around midnight, during which he led the investigators to the scene of the incident and to the defendants' walking routes after the incident, and pointed to places and items that they had hidden and thrown away after the incident (P/5B, P/16, P/90).
Defendant 1 first led to 8A HaZeit Street, pointed out where he had stolen a towel in order to wrap the gun, and at the place he pointed to behind the house, near a playground among the vegetation, a pistol was found with a magazine with 11 bullets and a black holster, inside a towel (P/40, P/40A, P/41, P/16, P/52). The pistol was checked and it was ascertained that it was registered in the possession of the deceased's place of work (P/40, P/42), and later it was ascertained, according to the serial number, that it was a pistol carried by the deceased on behalf of his place of work (P/84, P/93, P/93A). Later it was determined that the pistol and bullets are weapons as defined in the law, and that the pistol shoots and has the power to kill (P/83, P/41).