In our case, I did not find that the new law constitutes a lenient law in the case of the defendants, since even after Amendment 137 to the Law, they fall within the scope of the offense of murder in aggravated circumstances, according to section 301A(a) of the Law, which is punishable by mandatory life imprisonment.
In the framework of the offense of murder under aggravated circumstances, the legislature enumerated 11 circumstances, in which at least one of them exists, an act of murder (causing the death of a person intentionally or indifferently) will become murder under aggravated circumstances, which is punishable by mandatory life imprisonment. The following are the circumstances listed in the section:
")1) The act is done after planning or after an actual process of weighing and formulating a decision to kill;
(2) The act is done in order to enable the commission of another offense or to facilitate its commission, or in order to conceal the commission of another offense, or allow escape from the law after committing the other offense...;
(3) The victim was a witness in a criminal trial or was expected to testify in a criminal trial or a judge in a criminal trial and the act was done with the aim of preventing or impeding an investigation or legal process;
(4) The act was motivated by racism or hostility towards the public...;
(5) The act is done as a punitive act with the aim of imposing authority or fear and imposing behavior on the public;
(6) The victim is his partner and the act is committed after systematic or ongoing abuse, Physical or mental;
(7) The act was done with special cruelty, or while physically or mentally abusing the victim;
(8) The victim is helpless, A minor under the age of 18 14 years or a minor who commits the offense is responsible for it...;
(9) The act was committed while creating a real danger to the life of another person in addition to the victim;
(10) The act is an act of terror as defined in the Counter-Terrorism Law...