Defendant 2 confirmed his statements in previous interrogations, according to which part of Defendant 1's plan was to hit the deceased in the back and then kill him and bury him, adding, "At first, when we were in the forest, he said he wanted to kill him and then bury him. I said to him, 'How can you bury him, how can you dig the pit because it was raining at the time?' ... And he just wanted to burn it." When he was told that he was not surprised that Defendant 1 had hit the deceased in the back, he replied that he did not know that he really wanted to kill him; He did not explain why, then, he did not ask defendant 1 why he was taking the sock or why he asked them to change his clothes (ibid., at pp. 61-62). When he was told that even though he knew what Defendant 1's plans were, he had come to the meeting, so that he was an accomplice to the acts, Defendant 2 claimed that he had been threatened even before the incident, and that he had not mentioned it before because he was afraid and his mind was not working properly; He insisted that he did not know that defendant 1 wanted to kill the deceased, and that he only wanted to threaten the deceased to give them the drugs (ibid., at pp. 64-66).
In his last interrogation on March 13, 2018, at 1:17 P.M. (Message P/15, CD P/15B, transcript of P/15A), after he was played part of a telephone conversation (conversation 20-27-21 of February 26, 2018), Defendant 2 recognized that he was talking to Defendant 1 and they arranged to speak and meet. When the whole conversation was played to him, he said, "In this conversation I asked [Defendant 1] who we were going to meet with, it was Sunday if I remember... I asked [Defendant 1] who we were meeting with, what was his name, because after all [Defendant 1] told me that he was going to introduce me to a drug dealer, so I wanted to see who I was going to meet, what his name was, I wanted to check, I had never met this person in my life... I wanted to see who I wanted to meet, if he was dangerous, the person was a drug dealer, so I wanted to see if he could do anything for us" (it should be noted that listening to the CD shows that he also said, "I thought to check maybe I know him" – p. 22, s. 56). When asked why he was interested in whether the deceased was alone in Israel, he replied, "Because as I told you, it's a family, how do I know which family he belongs to, it could be that he belongs to a family of criminals, he may be a dangerous person, I checked everything because I didn't want to take risks... I checked with [Defendant 1], asked him if he had a family, and [Defendant 1] told me that he did not have and that he was not a dangerous person. Because [defendant 1] knew the deceased long before I knew him" (it should be noted that listening to the CD shows that he also said, "Family is something that I am constantly checking in this matter" – pp. 23, 24-25). When he was told that in this conversation he told defendant 1 that he was asking because he wanted to check something and to ask if he had checked, he replied that he had only checked with defendant 1; To the question of why he did not say this in the conversation, he replied that defendant 1 knew what he meant and that it was self-evident (P/15 S. 60-96).