Adv. Y. Singer : Say, when the deceased broke up with you and shouted now you're dead, you didn't even say in the reconstruction, that's part of the things you remembered?
...
The Honorable Judge I. Hellman : You are asked what things you remember that were not accurate.
The defendant, Mr. D. Mukin : I remembered the events.
The Honorable Judge I. Hellman : So tell me what else.
Adv. Y. Singer : The fact that you didn't just say you're dead is something you remembered?
The defendant, Mr. D. Mukin : Nope. It's not something I remembered, it's something I remembered more about what happened afterwards, how many times I shot in the air, whether after the barricade or before the barricade, like, just the sequence of events, what I said was something I thought I had already said from the first interrogation.
Adv. Y. Singer : What is what I said? What did you think you said in the first interrogation?
The defendant, Mr. D. Mukin : That when he actually disconnected from me he ran with death threats, I was sure that I had already told them this from the beginning, but you can see in the interrogation that I didn't tell them that, as if I thought in my head that it had already been said."
In his cross-examination, the defendant repeated these two explanations (p. 605 of Prot., para. 16 ff.):
"Q: And now you're zeroing out mentions of that sentence of "Now you're dead, now you're dead, I'm going to kill you" in the first version, I hear it endlessly in the second version B/6. I refer to page 30, lines 1-2, page 35, line 2, page 37, line 31, page 39, line 7, page 42, line 28, and I stopped here, I could have given you a lot more such mentions. You don't stop repeating this sentence suddenly from zero to hundred. You didn't say a word about that sentence in the first version, maybe you forgot to say, maybe not. Suddenly you don't stop saying it, repeating it, repeating it, repeating it, why? Why? Explain to me why you repeated it so many times all of a sudden?