Further to what was described, the defendant was handcuffed, and after a gag payment of hours, when another guard passed by the civilian file of the detention in which he was staying, and answered the defendant's question that he would probably be released from his shackles only the next day, the defendant returned and threatened the guard with a financial file – the prison guard's daughter.
It seems that the reason that led to the consolidation of the defendant's claims to threaten a financial-supreme case The guard and her daughter in the presence of the guards was that he was held in the custody of the guards (permanently) do/injunction/injunction (permanent), prevention (permanent) demolition without conviction in his frustration, when he was detained in the detention center for 3 days and later remained handcuffed to his hands and feet.
In all of the events in the two attached files, the defendant was able to understand the consolidation of the claims that he was making and the consolidation of the wrongful claims in his actions, and he was able to refrain from committing the offenses. However, it is clear that the threats made by the defendant in the arbitration proceedings in the main case against the detectives and the throwing of the objects, as well as the threats made by the defendant in the second charge in the attached file against the warden and her daughter in front of the guards, were not the mudof an appeal in a case-high court case based on prior planning, but were made out of frustration, uncontrollable anger, and perhaps even out of distress.
I will not be able to determine, as requested by counsel for the defendant, that the threats in the second indictment in the attached file are the appealof the case of the Supreme Court of the defendant because the defendant did not have access to the National Insurance Institute during his arrest and the consolidation of the treatment claims that he is fromthe National Insurance Institute in the mannerof the Appeals Committee for the drug Cipralex, since this fact did not appear in the arbitration claims of the indictment, the facts of which were amended in accordance with the agreements reached in the appeal of the case of the case of the Supreme Court The parties and a request for dissolution of the marriage, the defendant confessed. In addition, the fact that the defendant did not receivethe National Insurance Institute for medication was not proven before me by any evidence (although it was possible to request to file a financial file – this is evidence, for example, by submitting the defendant's medical file to the Prison Service).