Criminal Case (Shalom-Tav) 23789-08-13 State of Israel v. Volodin (09.10.2013) - The defendant was hired to work under the authority of the Registrar of the Financial Case - Supreme Court according to his confession to the offense of threats Financial Case - Supreme Prison Guard. A range of punishment was determined, ranging from conditional imprisonment to imprisonment in a monetary case – the upper to the prohibition of publication of months and a financial case – the defendant was sentenced to two months in prison, along with accompanying punitive components.
Criminal Case (Shalom-KG) 54223-06-12 State of Israel v. Zagori (08.04.2014) - The defendant was hired under the authority of the Registrar after managing evidence of the offense of threats Financial Case - Supreme Prison Guard. A penalty range ranging from 6 to 18 months in prison was determined in a financial case – the Supreme Court and the Supreme Financial Case – the defendant was sentenced to 6 months in prison, of which 4 were simultaneous and 2 months cumulative, along with accompanying punishment components.
I will refer below to a review of additional case law, which can teach the Kafi-supreme case the punishment policy used for the offense of threats together with the offense of violating a legal provision, in accordance with the circumstances of the main case, as follows:
Criminal Case (Shalom-St.) 24944-09-21 State of Israel v. Conqueror (10.12.2024) - The defendant orderedwages under the authority of the Registrar after hearing evidence of the offense of threats against a social worker and the offense of violating a legal provision by prohibiting the publication of conditions of release. A penalty range has been determined that ranges from imprisonment in a financial case - supreme condition to 10 months in prison in afinancial case - supreme. Since the defendant had no previous convictions, and in light of the accuser's position at the beginning of the proceeding that a financial case should not be sentenced to imprisonment, the court decided to impose a financial case in which the defendant was sentenced to two prison terms and a financial case – a supreme probation, along with the accompanying punitive components of a fine and compensation.