Caselaw

Criminal Case (Rishon LeZion) 24090-05-25 State of Israel v. Tom Ziv Ursula - part 22

December 24, 2025
Print

After listening  attentively to the consolidation of the parties' arguments, I have carefully reviewed the collection of case law that was filed  in the case  law of the Supreme Court, as  well as in other rulings, I have made a distinction between the various cases in the case law and our case in terms of severity and its sound, and I have also taken into account the principle of adequacy, the protected values that have been affected by the appeal of a case-supreme case  and the degree of harm to them and the circumstances of the decision of the Offenses Appeals Committee, I determine the consolidation of the claims of the penal complexes in our case.  As follows:

As for theAppeals Committee, which is the subject of the main case,  the appropriate penalty ranges from agag tax and a monthly prison sentence that can be served and a prohibition order (permanent) made/injunction (permanent) and prevention (permanent) by way of community service and up to 12 months of imprisonment to be served in afinancial case – supreme alongside accompanying punitive components.

According to theAppeals Committee, the subject of the first indictment in the attached file,  the appropriate punishment range ranges from 8 months imprisonment that can be served and a (permanent) injunction (permanent) do/injunction (permanent) and an injunction (permanent) and up to 18 months of imprisonment to be served in afinancial case – supreme alongside accompanying punitive components.

As for the AppealsCommittee, the subject of the second indictment in the attached file,  the appropriate punishment ranges from 6 months imprisonment that can be served and served in a (permanent) injunction or injunction (permanent) and a (permanent) injunction to be served in a financial case – supra alongside accompanying punitive components.

Exceeding the appropriate punishment range

In the present case, I have not found that there are considerations justifying a deviation from the compound to the severity of the custody of a financial file – the Supreme Court of Public Peace or the voice of the Israel Police to rehabilitate, nor  was it argued in this way that a financial case – supreme in the hands of either of the parties.  Financial-Supreme Case Yes, an appeal must be determined to consolidate the defendant's sentence within the appropriate penalty range.

Previous part1...2122
23...27Next part